Serial: Season One: Final Thoughts

Hello all, and welcome back to the good ol’ blog. I believe that this will be my last post, so I’ll try to make it a good one!

In this post, I’m going back to discussing the podcast Serial, and my final thoughts as to Adnan Syed’s guilt or innocence. I finished the first season with Episode 12: What We Know, which you guys can find here.

I’ll admit, at first, I thought Adnan Syed was guilty. After all, he’s been tried in a court of law, and found guilty. If the court system is throwing innocent people in jail, especially on a charge as significant as this, can we trust it? I feel that the answer is no. If we begin to doubt the justice system, the world begins to fall apart, dissolving into corruption and conspiracy, whether actual or merely perceived. For this reason, I, and I believe most people, put their faith in the court system, and trust the outcomes of its processes.

The court system (Russia Now).

Sarah Koenig, the narrator of this podcast changed my thoughts a little bit. She pointed out that much of the evidence used to convict Syed is very unreliable and circumstantial. No one knows if Syed made the call, or if Jay Wilds did, or if it was someone else! Someone could know who made the call, and could be lying, or not telling anyone at all. It’s a mess, and I don’t think that the cell phone records are reliable. Also, the other outstanding piece of evidence is the testimony of Jay Wilds. HIs story changed, and some of the information he provided was proved false. There are several alibis, all for different people. To put it in the word’s of Koenig, the case is a mess (Serial “What We Know”). It’s incredible to think that the case and verdict took as little time as they did, when it appears that the case should have dragged out for months, even years.

There is also the issue of Asia McClain.  She provided Syed with a very clear alibi, stating that he was at the library at the time of the murder, with her, chatting.  McClain even went so far as to provide a signed affidavit affirming her statement.  For no particular reason, this was never explored in court, not even mentioned.  Furthermore, Asian McClain was never even contacted by Syed’s lawyer, Cristina Gutierrez.

A picture of Asia McClain (Khan)

Speaking of Gutierrez, that’s a mystery in and of itself.  She did not explore many possibilities and pieces of evidence that may have resulted in Adnan Syed being found guilty.  Strange thing for a defense attorney to do to her client.  Some, including Koenig, have speculated that Gutierrez may have planned to appeal the case, and then win there, allowing her to charge the Syed more money.  Before this could happen, an investigation occured and Gutierrez was disbarred for overcharging her clients.  In the years since, Gutierrez has died, forever leaving these questions unanswered (Serial “The Alibi”) .  I must ask, though, is it possible that Syed’s lawyer could have blown the case in an effort to make more money in the appeal.  Would a lawyer be able to send someone who they are supposed to protect to prison for more money?


US Currency is seen in this January 30,
Money, money, money (Tight Lines).


There is also the issue of another criminal.  According to Episode 12 of Serial, the Innocence Project found that a criminal was released around the same time that Hae Min Lee was killed, and that he was known to have killed in a similar way to the way Lee was found.  DNA testing was being performed at the time of the episode airing, and I was not able to find the results.


Something has happened, that also helped change my mind.  Syed and his lawyer have come forward and asked for a new trial, thanks to the evidence uncovered by Sarah Koenig and the Serial podcast (Anderson).  The court has not yet decided on whether or not to grant the motion, but it has been delayed for a considerable length of time, meaning that there is serious consideration going on about the case and its verdict.  This influences my opinion and thoughts the greatest, pushing me to believing in Syed’s innocence more and more.  If a court is taking over a year to reach a decision on whether or not to give Syed a new trial, I begin to question the original verdict (Fenton).


New trial for Syed (Fraser)?


All facts taken into account, I feel that Adnan Syed is innocent.  There are too many inconsistencies and an appalling lack of solid evidence involved in this case.  The details and facts of this case are so few and far in between that I don’t think Syed’s case should ever have been brought to trial.  I understand that the prosecution probably wanted to solve a murder, and to bring closure to a grieving family, but at the cost of a young man’s freedom?  The court is supposed to find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and I don’t think that the jury was really able to do this with the case, as I can’t.  I can’t even imagine being able to, when imagining just the facts that were available at the time of the trial…

I believe that Sarah Koenig and the entire team of Serial has done some excellent investigative journalism, and uncovered interesting issues and details of the case.  They have brought the attention of the world onto an old case in Maryland, and this may result in the exoneration of an innocent man.  It will be interesting to see what the ultimate outcome of the case will be, and I will definitely be waiting to hear it.


Serial (Cresswell)


That’s all for now!  A huge thank you to all my readers, for doing just that, reading.  Alec Gilvesy, signing off.

Works Cited

Anderson, Jessica. “Appeals Court to Hear Arguments June 8 on Whether ‘Serial’ Subject Syed Should Receive New Trial.” 31 May 2017. Web. 28 July 2017.

Cresswell, Leanne. “Serial Podcast: Episode 1 ‘The Alibi’ – Summary.” Leanne Cresswell. 05 Dec. 2016. Image. 28 July 2017.

“Episode 01: The Alibi.” Serial. Podcast. 28 July 2017.
“Episode 12: What We Know.” Serial. Podcast. 28 July 2017.
“Faith and Money.” Tight Lines. Image. 28 July 2017.
Fenton, Justin. “Appeals Court Takes up ‘Serial’ Case, Could Extend Resolution by a Year or More.” 18 Jan. 2017. Web. 28 July 2017.
Fraser, Keith. “B.C. Man Convicted of Sex Offences against Minor Gets New Trial.” Vancouver Sun. 08 Feb. 2017. Image. 28 July 2017.
Khan, Mariam. “Asia McClain Speaks Out About ‘Serial”s Adnan Syed.” ABC News. ABC News Network. Image. 28 July 2017.
“Russian Intellectual Property Court to Review Procter & Gamble Claim in Trademark Dispute.” Russia Now. 11 July 2016. Image. 28 July 2017.


Post-Colonial Literary Theory and Robert Macfarlane’s “The Wild Places”

Hello, all!  Here’s a video, which explains post-colonial literary theory and how it relates to The Wild Places.  I’ve included a transcript below.

Hi guys, and welcome back to my blog!  This time we’re discussing the second half of Robert Macfarlane’s The Wild Places, and how it relates to post-colonialism literary theory.

To start things off, I’ll establish who the coloniser is, and who the colonised is.  In this book, humans are the colonisers, and the wild places of the United Kingdom are being colonised.  I’ll give you an example to show how this is the case.    Macfarlane, the author, visits a holloway on one of his journeys, which is essentially “[a] route that centuries of use has eroded down into the bedrock, so that it is recessed beneath the level of the surrounding landscape.  Most will have started out as drove paths, paths to market.  Some as Saxon or pre-Saxon boundary ditches.  And some, like the holloways near Bury St Edmunds, as pilgrim paths.” (135).  These paths are created out of the landscape by human actions.  The people responsible for creating these paths, pushed nature and the wilderness out of their way, and forced their will upon it.  This aligns perfectly with post-colonialism literary theory, because it is clear that there are two, distinct groups: the humans, the colonisers; and the wilderness, the colonised.  

This theme of the wilderness being oppressed and changed is frequently mentioned in the book.  I’ll give you another example.  Robert Macfarlane has a friend, Roger.  Roger has a farm, and has lived there for a considerable length of time, almost forty years.  At the time Roger first moved to his farm, “…he estimated there to be four miles of hedge within half a mile of his house, excluding his land, and a total of thirty-seven miles of hedge in the parish itself.  Now only one and a half miles were left in his vicinity, and no more than eight miles in the entire parish.” (Macfarlane 140).  This is just in one parish, but, “[s]ince the Second World War, the UK’s ancient hedgerows have dramatically declined due to removal to increase field size and to make way for development. By the 1990s, 121,000 km of hedgerows had been lost across the UK.” (The Wildlife Trusts 8).  This shows that the destruction of these hedgerows is very widespread, and has been occurring for quite some time.

In these two examples, you can see that there is a trend of almost hostility towards the wild, where humankind bends the wilderness to its will.  These two examples also show how this is done both consciously, and unconsciously, but both examples have the common fact that the colonisation of the wilderness benefits humanity.  Whether it is so that people are able to transport their goods to market more efficiently through the holloways, or for farmers to remove hedgerows to create larger fields, for more efficient farming, the destruction of the wild has clear benefits for mankind.  

Robert Macfarlane, in one of his travels, visits Orford Ness.  The Ness is a place consisting mainly of shingles, with sparse vegetation.  Its size and shape shifts with every tide and storm, and wind is constant.  Even in a place such as this, humanity has left their mark, with “…enigmatic military structures…protrud[ing] from the shingle – pre-fabricated barracks, listening stations, beacons, watch-towers, bunkers, [and] explosion chambers.” (Macfarlane 161).  The resilience of humankind, and our ability to build and shape nearly every location and landscape is remarkable, but it is also damaging.  Humanity often has little regard for the importance of the wilderness, typical of the colonisers for the colonised, and this importance is often not recognised until too late.

Nearer to the end of the book The Wild Places, there is almost a reversal of the theme of the book, where instead of the humans being the colonisers, and the wilds the colonised, humankind and its civilisation and legacies are shown to be colonised by the wilderness.  For example, Macfarlane mentions what happened with the wilderness around Chernobyl in the years after the disaster, and the establishment of the exclusion zone.  He mentions that “…silver birch now throng the empty streets and court-yards.  Flower meadows of exceptional botanical diversity have grown up through the paving stones.  Forests of pine and willow have populated the city’s outskirts…” (175).  This reversal of the roles of coloniser and colonised is unique, and interesting, as it is not evident in other works.  Macfarlane does not say that this reclamation by nature is happening soon, but rather that it is coming.  With global warming, and rising sea levels, settlements will be abandoned, and “[v]egetable and faunal life will reclaim them: the opportunist pioneer species first – dog-rose, elder, fireweed, crows…” (175).  Global warming and the rise of the sea can almost be seen as the revenge of nature for colonisation, and they are very real events, that are happening. Evidence such as “[c]ore samples, tide gauge readings, and, most recently, satellite measurements tell us that over the past century, the Global Mean Sea Level (GMSL) has risen by 4 to 8 inches (10 to 20 centimeters).” (National Geographic 1).  It is human activity that has caused this rise, and nature is fighting back, similar to the colonised rising up against the colonisers.

I hope I’ve outlined how The Wild Places demonstrates attributes of post-colonialism literary theory, and offered some insight as to how humanity interacts with the wilderness.  The wild is essential to the planet for a myriad of reasons, and how we use and treat this wild can have a significant impact on the environment, both short-term and long-term.  We must take care, and be mindful of what we use from the wilderness, for these reasons.  Thanks for reading, everyone!  See you soon!

Works Cited

Hedgerows | CPRE Herefordshire. Web. 20 July 2017.

CITiZAN – Blog – Orford Ness: An Amazing Landscape with a Rich and Varied History – and an Extremely Dynamic Coastline. Web. 20 July 2017.

“Dog-rose – Rosa Canina.” Dog-rose | NatureSpot. Web. 20 July 2017.

Douville, Amanda. “Inside the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.” NY Daily News. 26 Apr. 2016. Web. 20 July 2017.

Faherty, Mike. “Symondsbury, Holloway.” Symondsbury, Holloway (C) Mike Faherty :: Geograph Britain and Ireland. Web. 20 July 2017.

Farminguk. “Farming Connect: Potential of Tree and Hedgerow Planting to Reduce Frequency and Impact of Flood Events – Farming UK News.” Farminguk. FarmingUK, 03 Nov. 2016. Web. 20 July 2017.

“FireweedChamerion Angustifolium.” Edible Wild Food. Web. 20 July 2017.

“Hedgerows.” Hedgerows | The Wildlife Trusts. Web. 20 July 2017.

Macfarlane, Robert. “The Wild Places.” Goodreads. Web. 20 July 2017.

Macfarlane, Robert. The Wild Places. New York: Penguin, 2008. Print.

“Orfordness.” The Crown and Castle. Web. 20 July 2017.

“Treasures from the Hedgerow: Elderflower Cordial.” The Teacup Chronicles. 15 July 2010. Web. 20 July 2017.

Warne, Kennedy. “Sea Level Rise.” National Geographic. 07 Apr. 2017. Web. 20 July 2017.

“The Circle of Life. The Little Elder Tree Mother. Elderberry Syrup and Tea!” Wildlettucegal’s Blog. 22 July 2015. Web. 20 July 2017.

Why Grade Twelve English Should Be a Requirement for all University Courses

Hello, surfers of the Internet!  Have you ever wondered why Grade 12 University Level English is a requirement for so many university courses?  It may seem unrelated in many fields, such as in engineering and in mathematics, but the skills learned in English are essential in almost everywhere, no matter what your interests are!  Today, I will be talking a little bit about how.

Learning how to analyze material in a manner such as explored in English classes is a valuable skill, and it is not taught in any other course.  Universities value this greatly, as evidenced by the fact that two of the top-ranked schools in Canada, McGill in Montréal,

McGill Arts Building, in Montréal

and U of T in Toronto, require 4U English for nearly all of their programs.  For instance,

University of Toronto, St. George Campus, Toronto


in engineering, writing up a report is a necessary skill.  Without some of the vital skills that one learns in English through doing things like writing an essay, writing things like these reports would be much more difficult, with the final product being of a much lower quality.  With these top two universities, one of which I hope to attend, valuing English so much, I want to do my best in the class, to learn the valuable skills it offers, and take this with me to university.

English class also provides an ideal environment for learning both teamwork and individual work.  For example, when I was making my director’s notebook in grade 11, I was working with 5 or 6 people, all with different skills, abilities and comfort levels.  It was only through working together that we were able to get the project complete, and with the highest level of quality.

Teamwork is a vital skill, exercised in English

As for working alone, grade 11 English also helped me to do this, and to do it well.  Managing the time required to produce lengthy literature analyses was difficult, but it helped me in my second semester, where I had two science courses and a math, and I know that it will continue to be of use to me in the future.  Time management and teamwork skills are essential in university, since, for many, it is their first time on their own, and they must manage their time well, to avoid slipping behind.  This further adds to the value grade 12 English courses have to universities.

Finally, English is communication.  Communicating is one of the most important things we do as human beings, and this is quintessential in school, in the workplace, and in life.  I love to talk to my teachers.  It’s the best way to express my thoughts and ideas, whether it be in writing, through analyses and essays, or verbally, through debates and discussions.  If you can’t communicate well with your professors in universities, you aren’t going to do as well as if you could.

All in all, folks, remember that English courses should be required for university courses because they provide many, many valuable skills that are applicable in university and beyond, no matter what field you are in.  That’s it for now! Peace!


“Ontario high school.” Ontario high school | Applying to Undergraduate Studies – McGill University. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 July 2017.

“Undergraduate Programs.” Undergraduate Programs | University of Toronto. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 July 2017.